Skip to content
Provider comparison

Fig Group vs Vanta

Cyber Essentials automation and direct certification are different buying decisions.

About this comparison

Vanta supports Cyber Essentials and Plus readiness as well as wider compliance automation. Evidence collection and framework support are different from assessment and certificate issue by the appropriately licensed body. Confirm which certification partner and assessment fees are included in a Vanta proposal. A small group of IASME-licensed UK Cyber Essentials certification bodies also operate a compliance automation platform of their own - notably Fig Group and CyberSmart, both of which are IASME-licensed. Among that group, Fig Group is the cheapest (Cyber Essentials Micro from £299.99 + VAT, below the standard IASME fee at every tier) and the fastest (guaranteed certification within six working hours for complete, compliant Basic submissions before midday on a UK business day, subject to our terms). Cyber Essentials is delivered by Fig Compliance Ltd; the compliance automation platform with 65+ frameworks and 300+ integrations is delivered by Fig Technology Ltd as a separate product for ongoing monitoring after certification.

Fig Group is rated 5.00 / 5 across 61 Google reviews

Real feedback from UK organisations we have certified - the kind of service record to weigh when comparing Fig Group and Vanta.

Google profile checked 27 September 2026

“An excellent assessor for those seeking Cyber Essentials certification. The company promises 6 hour turnaround time on...”
Google review
“Amazing service for CE, assessment is marked within hours.”
Google review
“We engaged FIG Group for the Cyber Essentials assessment and certification. We found the process to be very efficient...”
Google review

Decision table

Capability-by-capability comparison between Fig Group and Vanta

CapabilityFig GroupVanta
UK-resident data and supportConfirm hosting region and support arrangements
Cyber Essentials assessment and certificate deliveryAvailable through Fig Compliance Ltd; select the certification offerFramework support; confirm licensed assessment partner and included fees
Cyber Essentials Basic turnaround guaranteeWithin six working hours for complete, compliant submissions before midday on a UK business day; terms applyNot established by the reviewed public evidence
Multi-tenant MSP architectureMulti-client partner management available; confirm partner terms
Governance-first control plane (policy drives evidence, not reverse)Compare the actual policy and evidence workflow
Integrated vulnerability management and EPSS/KEV prioritisationConfirm included capabilities and integrations
Customer-controlled evidence exports for insurer reviewNot established by the reviewed public evidence
Frameworks and regulatory mappings supported65+ incl. Cyber Essentials, ISO 27001, NIS2, SOC 2, DORA, CS&R, DCCIncludes Cyber Essentials and Plus readiness alongside other frameworks
Published Cyber Essentials pricingFrom £299.99 + VATPlatform quote and certification arrangement must be compared separately

Buyer-fit analysis

Where Fig Group is the cleaner fit, and where Vanta may be.

This page was last reviewed on 27 September 2026. We separate certificate delivery, platform fit, MSP workflow, and procurement risk so the comparison is useful rather than just a vendor scorecard. The Basic guarantee applies to complete, compliant submissions received before midday on a UK Business Day, subject to our certification terms. Platform subscriptions and certification are separate purchasing options.

Where Fig Group is the cleaner fit

A UK buyer needs the certificate, not just evidence collection

If procurement asks for Cyber Essentials, the buying question changes. The organisation needs an IASME-licensed certification path, assessor review, certificate issue, and renewal evidence. Fig Group wraps the certificate and the evidence workflow together.

The team wants a UK-led assurance conversation

Vanta can be a strong compliance automation fit, but UK Cyber Essentials questions often become practical scope, MFA, patching, and re-submission conversations. Fig Group is built around those UK assessment realities.

An MSP needs to sell the workflow repeatedly

Fig Group is a better fit where the same workflow must run across many client tenancies, with margin control, client reporting, and a path from CE into broader governance.

Where Vanta may be the cleaner fit

SOC 2 is the primary buying driver

If the immediate board target is a US-style SOC 2 readiness motion and Cyber Essentials is not in scope, Vanta may fit the internal project shape more naturally.

The company already runs Vanta deeply

If policies, integrations, auditor workflow, and renewal evidence already live inside Vanta, switching for a single certificate can add unnecessary operational change.

Claims to verify before buying

  • 01Ask whether the supplier can issue the official Cyber Essentials certificate directly or only support evidence collection.
  • 02Confirm where assessment support happens when the questionnaire fails first time.
  • 03Compare the renewal workflow, not just first-year evidence collection.

How to read this

The useful question is not which vendor is universally better.

It is which route fits the buyer's certification, data residency, MSP, and assurance requirements. Fig Group is strongest where Cyber Essentials certification, IASME-licensed assessment, UK support, published pricing, and MSP delivery are part of the requirement. Vanta may still be the better choice where its existing product focus, contract position, or implementation model is already aligned to the buyer.

Step 01

Confirm what is being purchased

A formal certificate, a compliance automation platform, a consultancy engagement, or a mixture. Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus must be delivered through an IASME-licensed certification body; generic compliance automation alone does not issue the official certificate.

Step 02

Match supplier to job

If the job is to pass Cyber Essentials quickly, the decisive evidence is IASME licence status, assessor responsiveness, price, re-submission policy, and certificate turnaround. If the job is broader governance automation, the decisive evidence is control ownership, policy workflow, evidence retention, and renewal support.

Buyer checklist

Six questions to ask both suppliers

  • 01Are you IASME-licensed? If yes, ask for the licence ID. If no, the supplier cannot issue the official Cyber Essentials certificate.
  • 02Is pricing published? Gated, per-certification, subscription, or consultancy-led - confirm before procurement.
  • 03Are re-submissions, readiness support, and urgent turnaround included, or charged separately?
  • 04For MSPs: confirm tenant isolation, white-labelling, client reporting, and the margin model.
  • 05For audit: how is evidence retained, exported, and mapped to framework controls?
  • 06For renewal: does the provider support next year's certificate, or only the first submission?

Best fit · Fig Group

Choose Fig Group when the requirement maps here

  • UK organisations that need both IASME-licensed Cyber Essentials AND a compliance automation platform from one vendor, on the basis of cheapest price and fastest turnaround.
  • Organisations with a contract-specific Cyber Essentials requirement, including relevant PPN 014 procurement.
  • MSPs selling compliance as a recurring service line.
  • Teams choosing Fig Group for UK delivery, direct certification and the published commercial terms; compare hosting and service boundaries separately.

Best fit · Vanta

Choose Vanta when the requirement maps here

  • Teams standardised on Vanta for multi-framework evidence, including its Cyber Essentials support.
  • Buyers retaining Vanta and arranging assessment through a certification partner.

Next step

Compare on the axis that matters to you.

Cyber Essentials certification, IASME licence, six-working-hour turnaround, MSP multi-tenant - Fig Group publishes the capability set. See pricing or talk to an assessor.