Skip to content
Fig platform · prove

Threat IntelligenceConnected to the bigger picture.

Contextual threat feeds mapped to your asset inventory and risk register.

Professional reviewing business documents
What this means for your team
  • Asset-Context Feeds
  • Vulnerability Correlation
  • Incident Integration
The practical difference

Threat Intelligence, with ownership and evidence.

Threat feeds are generic and noisy. Alerts reference assets you don't own or have already patched. Contextual threat information never reaches the teams responding to incidents.

01

Asset-Context Feeds

Raw threat intelligence filtered and scored against your actual asset inventory, supply chain, and geographical risk profile. Noise drops dramatically.

02

Vulnerability Correlation

Active threat exploits automatically matched to your vulnerability scan results and asset configurations. Prioritisation updates as fresh source evidence is processed.

03

Incident Integration

Threat context injected into incident investigations. Security teams see MITRE-aligned actor profiles, known techniques, and connected risk graphs linking incidents to your assets.

04

Third-Party Risk

Threat data mapped to your suppliers, partners, and critical dependencies. Early warning when your supply chain is targeted.

Inside Fig

See the work.
Keep the evidence.

This compliance controls view shows the wider Fig environment. Ask us to demonstrate threat intelligence against your own requirements.

A tailored walkthrough lets you review the relevant workflows, supported connections and reporting before deciding whether Fig is right for your team.

See it in a demo
Fig Cyber Essentials control table showing declared, enforced and evidenced control strength
Fig mobile app Home screen showing framework compliance, monitoring coverage and device posture
Fig platform · Compliance controls
Built around your role

One platform. Different responsibilities.

Bring delivery, oversight and assurance together without losing sight of who owns the next action.

Colleagues working together with laptops in an office

MSPs & MSSPs

Contextual threat intelligence standardised across your client portfolio. Client-specific feeds reduce alert fatigue and focus remediation efforts.

Explore Fig for MSPs
Business team discussing shared priorities

In-house teams

Operational security teams make faster threat decisions with portfolio context. Exec risk summaries show threat landscape impact on your business.

Explore Fig for organisations
Reviewing business records and supporting documentation

Compliance & audit teams

Evidence of threat monitoring, assessment, and incident response readiness for ISO 27001, DORA, and security control audits.

Discuss your requirements
A considered start

Evaluate the fit. Then agree the rollout.

Start with the outcomes you need. We will discuss scope, delivery and commercial terms with you before you commit.

  1. 1

    Tell us what matters

    Discuss your current approach to threat intelligence, the teams involved and the requirements you need to meet.

  2. 2

    Review the workflows

    See the relevant features in a tailored demonstration. Confirm integration coverage, responsibilities and any configuration needed.

  3. 3

    Agree your next step

    Review the proposed scope and pricing. Set implementation priorities, ownership and review points around your organisation or client portfolio.

Platform functionality and automation depend on the agreed scope, configuration and connected systems. Software supports your compliance programme; it does not replace an independent assessment or guarantee certification.

Before you decide

Your questions, answered.

Need to discuss a specific requirement or client scenario?

Speak to Fig
What threat sources does Fig Group integrate with?

Fig Group ingests feeds from CISA, Microsoft, Shodan, URLhaus, and commercial providers. Feeds are normalised and scored by relevance to your asset inventory and industry.

How quickly does threat context reach incident responders?

Threat context is delivered as connected feeds are collected and processed. Agree the feed coverage, refresh interval and escalation rules for your scope; publication-to-delivery time depends on provider availability, collection and processing. Critical threats can be escalated to SOC and security teams under those rules.

Can we filter feeds by industry or region?

Yes. Threat feeds are filtered by your industry sector, geographical presence, and technology stack. Relevance scoring helps reduce alert fatigue. Its accuracy depends on current asset and supplier records, so your team should review coverage and emerging threats.

Do we need a dedicated threat analyst to use this?

No. Fig Group does the correlation and filtering automatically. Your security team sees prioritised, contextual alerts rather than raw intelligence. If you do have dedicated analysts, they can dig into the underlying data and build custom correlation rules.

How does threat intelligence feed into our incident response?

When an incident is opened in Fig Group, relevant threat context is attached automatically. Responders see known actor profiles, MITRE ATT&CK techniques, and indicators of compromise linked to your specific assets, without having to search for it themselves.

Take the next step

See how threat intelligence could work for you.

Tell us what you would like to achieve. We will arrange a relevant conversation about the platform, your requirements and the right next step.

  • A walkthrough focused on your priorities
  • Clarity on scope, connections and delivery
  • A discussion of pricing for your requirements

Speak to Fig

Tell us what you need. We’ll help you take the next step.

A brief message is all we need to get started.